Nothing is claimed or implied, the section is 100% factual. This başmaklık already been covered, so unless you have something new to add, don't bring it up again.
I wouldn't suggest any. So far, I've been making compromises kakım requested, and still the entire section is being blanked. It's someone else's turn now. You have a go at pleasing me. And phooey on your policy complaints. They are absolutely 100% baseless, point by point, item by item, over and over again. Nobody özgü anything specific to say, so I'm going to call it a red herring from now on.
I ask you what information are you trying to convey with the section? What do you want the reader to take away from it?
I agree with Dan that the text loses much informative value without the image to illustrate it, but, since the text is so specific, I think it birey still stand alone. We'll resort to dispute resolution only on the image issue, if we dirilik agree to allow the text in the article.
By order of Washington Governor Jay Inslee, the man responsible for a horrific triple-murder robbery in 1980 will derece be released from prison on parole due to the killer's failure to “demonstrate both a full acceptance of his responsibility and remorse.â€
The 49-year-old said throughout the investigation that he searched for and downloaded child abuse material so he could identify paedophiles online.
ABINGDON, Va. (AP) — A Virginia man saf been sentenced to more than seven years in prison for using an online Çocuk porno izle messaging application to distribute child sex abuse materials, a federal prosecutor said.
The article is about child pornography. The section is about examples of child pornography. There is nothing notable about that.
†“It’s important to emphasize this is not about why aren’t police killing white supremacist terrorists,†said Qasim Rashid, a human rights lawyer and satellite radio host who was among those on social media making posts about the subject.
Since this is a Supreme Court case that draws on other cases throughout the USA, it is notable. It is especially good for use here because it's very specific in it's descriptions, and because it doesn't do much in setting new precedents.
I personally agree with you, I Long live Fascism think it's nonsensical myself, but you are arguing with the wrong person. The court decides what is child pornography, derece me. Take it up with them.
.. the celebrity therapist struck off for seducing his female patients: Pirates of the Caribbean film yıldızı's shamed sidekick  Naomie Harris wows in an eye-catching sheer white gown kakım she attends Cannes' Women in Cinema event  'I'd do another bikini shoot, why not?': Rachel Stevens, 44, reveals she would still be happy to pose for scantily-clad magazine photoshoots  Yumi Nu, 25, and Sahte cialis Maye Musk, 74, pose with their sizzling Sports Illustrated covers while soaking up the sun at Swimsuit on Location event in Florida  'No more itchy eyes in summer!' Why allergy sufferers are heading online for bespoke plans to stop runny noses, red eyes and other irritating symptoms - and DailyMail readers gönül save 50%  Sahte cialis satan site Winnie Harlow sizzles in a skimpy tamamen and high-waisted jeans bey she hands out Cay Skin sunscreen to lucky fans at the Santa Monica Pier Â
To derece entirely know what is happening, and have someone do or make you do things you are powerless to stop, kiÅŸi be horribly traumatizing. But there are so many different situations and different people, that it's hard to draw a line.
I think this section is POV to. While no particular statement seems to be POV on it's own the overall effect created is POV somewhat in favour of child pornography.